1,148,634

Records analysed

2024–25 (PLFS microdata)

Survey period

59.3%

All-India LFPR (15+)

57.4%

All-India WPR (15+)

3.1%

All-India UR (15+)

39.1 p.p.

Male–female LFPR gap

Why this matters

The dominant labour-market conversation often relies on headline unemployment alone. This observatory shifts the analytical lens to participation rates, employment quality, work intensity, demographic structures, and uneven vulnerabilities across gender, caste, religion, education, age, and geography.

The core finding: labour stress in India is distributed unevenly and often hidden inside aggregate improvements. By querying the microdata directly with survey-design weights, we reveal where structural strain is concentrated.

What the analysis covers

Headline Indicators

All-India LFPR, WPR, and UR with Usual Principal and Subsidiary Status (UPSS) and Current Weekly Status (CWS) comparisons.

Rural–Urban Divergence

Structural differences in female participation (45.9% rural vs 27.7% urban) and urban youth unemployment concentrations.

The Education Paradox

Steep positive gradient between education and unemployment: graduate UR reaches 11.2% while illiterate UR is 0.3%.

Social Stratification

Detailed breakdowns by Scheduled Tribe, Scheduled Caste, OBC, and General categories across regular salaried and casual work.

National Labour Data Bank

Filter, search, and download all 48 statistical matrices with dynamic D3 visualisations and instant CSV export.

Launch Data Bank →

Visual Scrollytelling Story

Experience the interactive narrative with animated radar, gap, and distribution charts.

Open Interactive Story →

Citation & Provenance

Kumar, Abhinav. (2026). PLFS Microdata Report 2024–25: Analytical Findings from Official Survey Microdata. India Labour Observatory. https://indialabourobservatory.com/stories/plfs-microdata-report-2024-25/